Soften restrictions on administrators being involved in the discussion around events that affect them #29
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Please prioritise contacting a community team member over non community team mem
|
|||
- They have via any other way interleaved their alt-accounts such that someone interacting with their alt-account knows they are interacting with a programming.dev admin.
|
||||
- It is recommended that administrators avoid getting into heated arguments with users. Administrators should as soon as they realise an argument is getting too heated or off-topic try to either de-escalate or disengage from the argument.
|
||||
- If an administrator wishes to engage in controversial topics, it is recommended that they use an alternate account not linked to their admin account. While this is only a recommendation, it is a highly recommended one as the site has been drawn into needless admin drama with other instances as a result of this guideline not being followed in the past.
|
||||
- Administrators are not allowed to moderate content they are personally entangled with. If a user posts a severe breach of the [Code of Conduct](https://legal.programming.dev/docs/code-of-conduct) that affects an administrator, the administrator should report the content and leave it to the rest of the admin team to handle. The administrator may not comment on the case unless questioned by the admin team and may under no circumstances suggest what action to take. The administrator is still allowed to temporarily remove the content if deemed necessary, such as in the instance of being doxxed, the administrator must however also immediately notify the admin team that they have taken such action. Breaking this *rule* is considered a severe breach of trust and power. Exceptions are made for CSAM, phishing attempts, or established spam/scam similar to the [Nicole spam](https://programming.dev/c/nicole@feddit.org).
|
||||
- Administrators are not allowed to moderate content they are personally entangled with. If a user posts a severe breach of the [Code of Conduct](https://legal.programming.dev/docs/code-of-conduct) that affects an administrator, the administrator should report the content and leave it to the rest of the admin team to handle. The administrator must not suggest what actions to take. The administrator may be part of the discussion of the event, but must step back if unable to remain impartial, or if asked by the other administrators. The administrator is still allowed to temporarily remove the content if deemed necessary, such as in the instance of being doxxed, the administrator must however also immediately notify the admin team that they have taken such action. Breaking this *rule* is considered a severe breach of trust and power. Exceptions are made for CSAM, phishing attempts, or established spam/scam similar to the [Nicole spam](https://programming.dev/c/nicole@feddit.org).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue